Initial Fieldwork Results
|
|
Categories: None
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
2 Comments
Reply
Marko zalad
2:53 PM on December 22, 2015
Greetings, I for one doubt Cuckney vies near the site of the battle of 633. You are very dismissive of Hatfiled and have failed to research the facts properly.
The Roman grave at Hatfield is typical of the story where the locals gathered the bodies of the slain Saxons and buried in the in an unceremonial pile.
The burial at Cuckney mart we'll be the remains of the Chriatian Welsh and Elmetians who being on the winning side.were carefully collected and taken to a place were they could be buried and laid to rest on friendly ground.
Theodore of Tarsus called two meetings at Hatfiled in 6729 the first was to mediate a peaceful solution to the Battle of the Trent where Northumbrian Prince Ecfrith of Northumbria was killed by the mercians under Aethelred, this he did negotiating a peace which stopped anymore blood shed.He then called a Synod at Hatfield to settle the matter of the Monothelites heresy.
So may the bodies are from the battle of the Trent?
You have a further battle to consider the battle of the Idle in 616 Ad where Raedwalds army killed Aelelfrith of Northumbria..
Regards
marko
The Roman grave at Hatfield is typical of the story where the locals gathered the bodies of the slain Saxons and buried in the in an unceremonial pile.
The burial at Cuckney mart we'll be the remains of the Chriatian Welsh and Elmetians who being on the winning side.were carefully collected and taken to a place were they could be buried and laid to rest on friendly ground.
Theodore of Tarsus called two meetings at Hatfiled in 6729 the first was to mediate a peaceful solution to the Battle of the Trent where Northumbrian Prince Ecfrith of Northumbria was killed by the mercians under Aethelred, this he did negotiating a peace which stopped anymore blood shed.He then called a Synod at Hatfield to settle the matter of the Monothelites heresy.
So may the bodies are from the battle of the Trent?
You have a further battle to consider the battle of the Idle in 616 Ad where Raedwalds army killed Aelelfrith of Northumbria..
Regards
marko
Reply
Ivor Holden
2:17 PM on January 24, 2016
Marko zalad says...
Greetings, I for one doubt Cuckney vies near the site of the battle of 633. You are very dismissive of Hatfiled and have failed to research the facts properly.
The Roman grave at Hatfield is typical of the story where the locals gathered the bodies of the slain Saxons and buried in the in an unceremonial pile.
The burial at Cuckney mart we'll be the remains of the Chriatian Welsh and Elmetians who being on the winning side.were carefully collected and taken to a place were they could be buried and laid to rest on friendly ground.
Theodore of Tarsus called two meetings at Hatfiled in 6729 the first was to mediate a peaceful solution to the Battle of the Trent where Northumbrian Prince Ecfrith of Northumbria was killed by the mercians under Aethelred, this he did negotiating a peace which stopped anymore blood shed.He then called a Synod at Hatfield to settle the matter of the Monothelites heresy.
So may the bodies are from the battle of the Trent?
You have a further battle to consider the battle of the Idle in 616 Ad where Raedwalds army killed Aelelfrith of Northumbria..
Regards
marko
I found your comments of interest Marko, and I agree with a lot of what you have posted however, I am a bit disappointed that no one from the Battle of Hatfield Investigation Society has seen fit to respond in any way. I find it difficult to understand why those running the Battle of Hatfield Investigation Society do not deem it important to respond given they state that they want to find the true battle site place yet seem blinkered to other suggestions which make me think that they have already convinced themselves that the site is at Cuckney and are blind to everything else!
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.